Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
safe distance from 5g tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.